Paper: Long-Horizon-Terminal-Bench: Testing the Limits of Agents on Long-Horizon Terminal Tasks with Den...
Listen to this article.
Audio is available for 30 days and will be removed automatically.
Problem
Current benchmarks used to evaluate AI agents often focus on simple tasks that complete quickly and are judged solely by their final outcome. This doesn’t give a full picture of an agent’s capabilities, especially when dealing with complex, real-world scenarios requiring sustained effort and iterative problem-solving. Existing “terminal” benchmarks (which judge only the end result) provide limited insight into intermediate progress and partial solutions due to sparse reward signals.



